The Work Experience of Teachers in Rural Canada: Examining Labour Market Conditions and Labour Mobility of Teachers in Rural Versus Urban Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The work experience of teachers in rural Canada: examining labour market conditions and labour mobility of teachers in rural versus urban Canada. Education is not only a key public institution it is central to the engagement and cohesion in many rural communities. One issue for rural communities is attracting and keeping teachers for their schools. This paper will review data from Statistics Canada to document the employment situation and the mobility of teachers in rural as compared to urban Canada. Specifically, it will use data from Canadian census and the annual Canadian Labour Force Survey to examine rural-urban differences and similarities in the trends over time in: the ratio of teachers to the school aged population; the number of teachers hired per year; the number of teachers with a permanent versus a temporary position, and the average tenure of employed teachers. Also presented will be data on teacher mobility in rural and urban areas, after one year and after five years. The paper will provide some key baseline data for understanding the labour market situation of teachers in rural as compared to urban areas of the country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".