MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415586582 · doi:10.21083/crrf.v29i1.7667

How is RuralGoing Digital? Using Community-BasedResearch to Understand Rural Broadband Use

2025· article· W4415586582 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wayne Kelly, Meghan Wrathall

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Rural Revitalization Foundation · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)BroadbandEmerging technologiesDigital divideProcess (computing)Rural areaPresentation (obstetrics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The knowledge economy is changing the rules and landscape for economic development. Rural communities could be one of the biggest beneficiaries of the new reality as broadband and other digital technologies can mitigate the challenges of distance and density that rural usually faces. To better harness digital technologies it is essential that rural communities consider the potential of the technologies and how they can align with community development plans. Community-based research (CBR) provides an exciting approach that can help communities work through the new opportunities and realities presented by digital technologies as the approach is based on communities leading the research process and working with researchers to explore issues and opportunities. This presentation will share CBR results from rural Manitoba communities that are exploring how broadband and digital technologies are currently being used and how those communities would like to use those technologies in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Rural Revitalization FoundationSame topicICT Impact and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207