MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415586596 · doi:10.21083/crrf.v29i1.7705

Accelerate Kootenays: Canada’s First Rural EV Network

2025· article· W4415586596 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meghan Lohmann

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Rural Revitalization Foundation · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismScope (computer science)TerrainGovernment (linguistics)Greenhouse gasElectric vehicleRural areaInteroperability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accelerate Kootenays is an innovative regional approach to build a network of electric vehicle charging stations between the Okanagan and Alberta. Increased adoption of electric vehicles (EV) by Kootenay residents will reduce transportation emissions and support local climate action commitments. The goal is to install the base network that will make electric vehicle travel safe, reliable and enjoyable. To make electric vehicle ownership and travel realistic for both rural residents and tourists, a collaboration of industry, government and tourism associations have endorsed and funded this electric vehicle strategy and network development. The Kootenay region of British Columbia has cold winters, rugged terrain and a sparse population. The transportation sector is a large contributor of community greenhouse gas emissions. There is high dependence on personal vehicles with limited alternate forms of transportation given low density and large distances between communities. Accelerate Kootenays is a $1.2 Million project that will transform the connectivity of the region, resulting in accelerated EV adoption and enhanced tourism and economic development. To drive broader EV market adoption, connectivity to rural areas, including parks, tourist destination and small communities must be part of the evolving EV 'ecosystem'. The project employs a unique approach to marketing and community engagement and develops branding opportunities at a regional scale. Explore the expanding scope of the EV ecosystem, and the necessity to look beyond the dense urban centers for robust network development, and consider the opportunities and advantages to connectivity across rural regions in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Rural Revitalization FoundationSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207