MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415586607 · doi:10.21083/crrf.v29i1.7717

Value Added: Partnerships for Prosperity

2025· article· W4415586607 on OpenAlexaff
Emmy Neuls, Heather Exner-Pirot, Ryan Gibson, Sean Willy

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Rural Revitalization Foundation · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Development and Aid
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperityIndigenousValue (mathematics)Investment (military)General partnershipCreating shared valueBest practice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partnerships can be pursued with the purpose of strengthening invested efforts in dealing with challenges in rural, northern and indigenous communities such as capacity building, economic development and good governance. These partnerships focus on building value added partnerships that are mutually beneficial to all partners. The partnerships are built upon an understanding that there are shared values among the stakeholders such as access to education and investment in community infrastructure. Pursuing these shared values together provides for future prosperity. This panel will share with you to best practices for value added partnerships within broad range of stakeholders including; universities, indigenous communities, business and government.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Rural Revitalization FoundationSame topicInternational Development and AidFrench-language works237,207