MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415586827 · doi:10.21083/crrf.v36i1.8114

Exploring Northern Attitudes: "Main Street Town Square" Pedestrian Pilot Project in Downtown Whitehorse

2025· article· W4415586827 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chia‐Wei Lin, Sara Epp

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Rural Revitalization Foundation · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowntownMetropolitan areaPedestrianPlacemakingUrban planningPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the summer of 2023, the City of Whitehorse piloted its first pedestrian-only zone on Main St between Front St and Second Avenue. The conversion of roadway and parking stalls into a pedestrian mall was met with mixed reception. While many urban centers in Canada and around the world have successfully pedestrianized parts of their downtown in an effort to revitalize street life and reduce reliance on private vehicles, these have been implemented in largely 'southern' or metropolitan contexts with higher population density and different mobility patterns compared to the Yukon. To further understand contextual and attitudinal differences in northern Canada, this study will explore the nuanced perceptions of the "Main Street Town Square" from Whitehorse residents and businesses through content analysis of official planning reports (City of Whitehorse) and social media commentary (i.e. Facebook, Instagram, Reddit). It will identify the key concerns and priorities of various stakeholders and propose recommendations for implementing a context-responsive approach to "smart growth" urban planning in the North.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Rural Revitalization FoundationSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207