The Intersection of Mutual Aid and Third Places in Rural Nova Scotia During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This ongoing research project intends to explore three primary items:• What is the relationship between mutual aid and third places in rural Nova Scotia?• How has this relationship changed with the COVID-19 pandemic?• What gaps might answering these questions reveal? And how do these items change the waywe think about social capital and community welfare?Literature outside of Nova Scotia indicates that the majority of mutual aid in the US and Canada is concentrated within the family unit or cultural community, rather than the larger neighbourhood. What do these geographies look like in rural Nova Scotia, and how has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the established landscape? Considering its relation to public space, are actors withdrawing to their immediate familial supports, whether they want to or not, or is COVID-19encouraging unique methods of community-building and care? Exploring these themes might help provide some insight into identifying policy gaps, challenges and opportunities to support capacity-development for explicit mutual aid projects, as well as providing a peek into this matter as it relates to pandemic conditions, namely COVID-19.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".