MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415589050 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-23102-y

Quantitative analysis of tissue oxygenation variability across anatomical landmarks in healthy individuals via near-infrared spectroscopy

2025· article· en· W4415589050 on OpenAlexafffund
Amir Parham Pirhadi Rad, Parsa Alizadeh, Mehdi Nourizadeh, Kiana Jahanshahi, Jocelyn Bégin, Leila Baktash, Aaron James Mah, Vincent Levandier, Babak Shadgan

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsThenar eminenceQuantitative assessmentPerfusionIn vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopySoft tissueForeheadFixation (population genetics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) enables noninvasive assessment of tissue oxygenation, but its broader clinical application is hindered by the absence of standardized reference values across anatomical regions. This study aimed to characterize baseline regional tissue oxygen saturation (rSO 2 ) across 17 anatomical landmarks in healthy adults and to identify the most consistent and reproducible measurement sites. Seventy-eight healthy participants (mean age 31 ± 13.4 years) underwent rSO 2 assessments using a continuous-wave NIRS system. Demographic and physiological data, including age, sex, skin pigmentation, tissue thickness, and mean arterial pressure, were collected. rSO 2 values ranged from 50.5 to 86.0%, with most values between 65 and 76%. The temporomandibular joint and mandibular ramus had the highest mean rSO 2 (~ 75.8%), while the thenar eminence and forehead showed the lowest. The quadriceps exhibited the lowest inter-individual variability (2.72 SD), making it the most reliable site for baseline measurements. The sternum also showed low variability (2.96 SD), suggesting its usefulness in dynamic monitoring. Age and sex significantly influenced rSO 2 ( p < .001), while other variables had limited impact. These findings establish normative rSO 2 values and identify optimal NIRS placement sites, supporting device-specific measurement in clinical and research applications to improve detection of tissue hypoxia and perfusion abnormalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207