MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415593481 · doi:10.1109/jestie.2025.3625417

A Single-Phase Six-Switch AC-AC Converter With Highly-Efficient Bipolar Buck and Boost Operations

2025· article· W4415593481 on OpenAlexafffund
Hafiz Furqan Ahmed, Mohsin Jamil

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSnubberInductorConvertersBuck converterCommutationPower (physics)VoltageBuck–boost converter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a highly-efficient bipolar buck boost AC-AC converter featuring a reduced number of active switches. By employing only six active switches, the proposed converter facilitates efficient symmetric-bipolar buck and boost operations, characterized by lower component voltage/current stress and ripples, features absent in existing AC-AC converters. Additionally, the converter offers the capability to adjust the output voltage frequency in discrete steps. Moreover, it employs only two inductors and filter capacitors, thereby providing second order input and output filters. Consequently, the converter ensures a continuous and low-ripple supply of input/output currents while eliminating the need for additional LC filters. Furthermore, due to the absence of bidirectional AC switches, the proposed converter mitigates device voltage or current overshoots during switching transitions, thus avoiding commutation issues without the necessity for lossy snubbers or safe-commutation algorithms. The paper explains the circuit operations of the proposed converter, based on developed PWM switch modulations, deriving various theoretical relations, and discussing component design. A comprehensive comparative evaluation against state-of-the-art bipolar AC-AC converters proves its superiority in terms of smaller voltage/current and power ratings of switching devices, reduced voltage/current ripples of passive components, minimized volume of passive components, and improved power conversion efficiency. Finally, experimental results from a laboratory-built prototype validate the theoretical analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207