Retrieval-Augmented Generation for GenAI-Enabled Semantic Communications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Semantic communication (SemCom) is an emerging paradigm aiming at transmitting only task-relevant semantic information to the receiver, which can significantly improve communication efficiency. Recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) have empowered GenAI-enabled SemCom (GenSemCom) to further expand its potential in various applications. However, current GenSemCom systems still face challenges such as semantic inconsistency, limited adaptability to diverse tasks and dynamic environments, and the inability to leverage insights from past transmissions. Motivated by the success of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in the domain of GenAI, this paper explores the integration of RAG in GenSemCom systems. Specifically, we first provide a comprehensive review of existing GenSemCom systems and the fundamentals of RAG techniques. We then discuss how RAG can be integrated into GenSemCom. Following this, we conduct a case study on semantic image transmission using an RAG-enabled diffusion-based SemCom system, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed integration. Finally, we outline future directions for advancing RAG-enabled GenSemCom systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.014 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".