MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415597937 · doi:10.1115/detc2025-166243

Optimizing Valved Holding Chambers for Enhanced Inhalation Therapy: Integrating Dakota and Ansys CFX in the Bezier-Curved Geometry Design Process

2025· article· W4415597937 on OpenAlexaff
Shahab Azimi, Siamak Arzanpour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptimal designProcess (computing)Engineering design processDesign processProcess designAerosolDesign toolBreakup

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we introduce a globally efficient optimization method for enhancing the design of valved holding chambers (VHCs), integral to inhalation therapy. Our approach harnesses the capabilities of the Dakota optimization software, integrated seamlessly with Ansys CFX for advanced modeling and simulation. We specifically focus on crafting a VHC body shape with Bezier-curved geometry, aiming to significantly improve the capture and formation of aerosol particles. This innovative design achieves an optimal balance between capturing larger particles and promoting the generation of finer particles, crucial for effective drug delivery. The cornerstone of our method is the strategic use of Dakota’s robust optimization algorithms, which guide the design towards achieving globally optimal solutions. In parallel, Ansys CFX provides detailed insights into the multiphase flow dynamics and particle breakup processes, essential for a thorough understanding of aerosol behavior in VHCs. The synergistic combination of Dakota and Ansys CFX enables a thorough exploration of the design space, leading to a highly optimized VHC design. Our study focuses on the classification and mass flow of microparticles from pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI). We employ a combination of computational simulations and experimental validations to assess the performance of our optimized VHC design compared to existing commercial models. The results clearly indicate the superior efficiency of our design in delivering fine microparticles. This study not only demonstrates the effectiveness of integrating Dakota and Ansys CFX in the optimization of medical devices but also represents a significant advancement in aerosol drug delivery technology. Our findings offer a new perspective on VHC design, promising enhanced pulmonary drug delivery through a globally efficient optimization process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207