RePaint-Enhanced Conditional Diffusion Model for Generating Designs Under Performance Constraints
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a novel framework integrating the RePaint method with the performance-guided denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) to complete missing or undefined design components based on any given partial structures while satisfying specified performance targets. RePaint allows a pre-trained diffusion model to synthesize designs under the condition of partial designs, offering flexibility and controllability of generative design results. Using a dataset of parametric ship hull designs, a performance-guided diffusion model is pre-trained to generate designs with targeted total resistance coefficients. Experiment results demonstrate that our method generates new designs from random incomplete ship hull designs with performances close to those generated by the pre-trained models. The study further analyzes factors that might influence the new framework’s performance and reveals that the pre-trained model’s design parameter value distribution has a significant effect on the new method’s output designs. This distribution can be leveraged to guide the synthesis of new designs with desirable performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it