MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415600637 · doi:10.1080/17451000.2025.2568654

From the Pacific to Europe: the rise of the headshield slug <i>Melanochlamys diomedea</i> in northern European waters

2025· article· en· W4415600637 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manuel António E. Malaquias, Cessa Rauch, Nina T. Mikkelsen, Cecilie Gotaas Sørensen, Thomas F. Hansen

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Biology Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlugPacific oceanEcosystemGulf Stream

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globalization of trade and travel is accelerating the introduction of non-indigenous marine species with ship traffic being the main vector. Norway, with the second longest coastline in the world has over 200 non-indigenous marine species documented in its waters. In this paper, we report the first record of the northeastern Pacific headshield slug Melanochlamys diomedea (Bergh, 1894) in continental Europe (Norway) and discuss potential pathways of its introduction. To confirm the taxonomic identity of specimens and to infer the origin of the northeastern Atlantic populations, we used molecular phylogenetics, species delimitation methods, genetic distances, haplotype network analysis, and morpho-anatomical comparisons. The collection of 90 individuals during 14 sampling events between August 2024 and May 2025, including both juveniles and adults, suggest that reproductive populations have already established in Norway. The exact origin of the specimens remains unclear but the absence of records from the northwestern Atlantic coasts of Canada and USA, combined with the increase in ship traffic across the Canadian Arctic support the hypothesis that a European population was introduced via shipping routes connecting the northeastern Pacific through the Arctic Northwest Passage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Biology ResearchSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207