MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415601377 · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2025.107878

On the validity of Wood’s law: From bubbly media to liquid foams

2025· article· en· W4415601377 on OpenAlex
Fanambinana Delmotte, Reine‐Marie Guillermic, Valentin Leroy, Thomas Brunet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasonics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPickering emulsions and particle stabilization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Saint-BonifaceUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de Saint-BonifaceUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsSpeed of soundAttenuationHomogeneousVolume (thermodynamics)Characterization (materials science)Acoustic attenuationRange (aeronautics)Acoustic wave

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the acoustic properties of various bubbly gels and foams in order to test the validity of Wood's law over a very wide range of gas concentration. By using a "double-syringe" technique, we obtain homogeneous mixtures of gas and liquid with controlled gas volume fractions ranging from 0 % to 100 %. The sound speed of acoustic waves propagating in these complex media is extracted from measurements performed at 20 kHz and reveals an excellent agreement with Wood's prediction. Attenuation measurements also complete the acoustic characterization of these bubbly media and foams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it