MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415603301 · doi:10.36847/knspsa.2025.20.1

A Comparative Study on the National Intelligence System in Commonwealth Countries : Focusing on the U.K., Australia, and Canada

2025· article· W4415603301 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKorean National Security and Public Safety Association · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntelligence, Security, War Strategy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommonwealthGovernment (linguistics)Variety (cybernetics)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

오늘날 정보는 국가안보에 필수 불가결한 요건인 만큼 대부분 주권국가는 국가정보기관을 운영하고 있다. 정보기관들은 다양한 형태를 보여주고 있지만 영연방 국가 정보기관은 공통적인 특징을 보여주고 있다. 본 연구는 영국·호주·3개 국가 정보기관의 조직·활동 및 통제 방식을 관통하는 원칙과 방향성을 살펴보고 시사점을 모색해보는데 목적이 있다. 이 들 3개 국가 정보기관을 연구 대상으로 선정한 이유는 정보연구의 외연 확대, 모범적인 정보활동, 정치적 독립성, 정보협의체 구축, 정보통제 등 여러면에서 시사점을 제공해줄 수 있기 때문이다. 이들 정보기관은 국내외 정보 분리형 정보기관을 운영하고 있으며, 국내외 정보활동이 균형을 이루는 가운데 정보공유와 분석이 큰 비중을 차지하고 있는 점이 특징으로 나타났 다. 이와 함께 분리형 정보체계의 단점을 보완하기 위해 국가정보협의체를 운영하고 시민 적 자유를 보호하기 위해 다층적이고 엄격한 정보통제기재를 갖추고 있다는 점을 확인하 였다. 국가정보 생산 시스템 구축, 실효적인 정보통제 시스템, 정보기관 이외 행정부 정보 역량 강화 등을 정책적 제언으로 제시할 것이다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKorean National Security and Public Safety AssociationSame topicIntelligence, Security, War StrategyFrench-language works237,207