MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415613813 · doi:10.5334/aogh.4750

Air–Noise Pollution Linkages: Testing Innovative Community-Based Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies in Kenya

2025· article· en· W4415613813 on OpenAlexaff
Manasi Kumar, Ngongang Wandji Danube, Vincent Nyongesa, Lucas Kalama, Carol Ngunu, Hassan Leli, Albert Tele, Edith Apondi, Josphat Asande, Osman Warfa, Ayub Macharia, Beatrice Madeghe, Obadia Yator, Darius Nyamai, Philip Osano

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Global Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsDepartment of National Defence
FundersFogarty International CenterNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsSoftware deploymentMental healthAir quality indexAir pollutionEnvironmental monitoringHealth careGuideline

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Our case study was conducted across healthcare facilities in Kilifi and Nairobi, where perinatal adolescents were screened for depression. Objective: The relationship of environmental monitoring in addressing mental health needs of vulnerable perinatal adolescent populations was explored. Methods: We installed outdoor air quality sensors at two facilities in Nairobi—Kangemi and Kariobangi North health centers—and two in Kilifi—Mtwapa and Vipingo health centers—and installed sensors in two households of two perinatal adolescents. Community health workers monitored air quality and noise levels data, collecting experiential data on stress and mood from perinatal adolescents. Findings: Air quality monitoring revealed site-specific variations in PM2.5 concentrations. Kariobangi Health Center recorded the highest mean concentration of 29.45 µg/m³, exceeding the WHO 2021 annual guideline of 5 µg/m³ indicating substantially degraded air quality. Kangemi Health Center was next (21.27 µg/m³), followed by Mtwapa (15.34 µg/m³) and Vipingo (12.52 µg/m³). Noise monitoring revealed consistently elevated exposure in healthcare settings. At Kangemi Health Center, mean noise levels reached 52.2 dB (median: 53.5 dB), surpassing the WHO guideline for hospital settings (<35–40 dB). Household-level air quality monitoring highlighted significant operational challenges: sensor deployment constraints, difficulties in ensuring continuous temporal coverage, and substantial intra-day variability—underscoring the need for improved monitoring design and calibration strategies. Conclusions: We tested air and noise monitoring deployment as a lever for strengthening the health system and a strategy for improved patient care and mental well-being. We trained community health workers and youth leaders in a task-shifting model to collect environmental health data. Our approach sought to ease the deployment of environmental monitoring in a sustainable data collection process. However, both mitigation, targeting reduction in sources of pollution, and adaptation efforts focused on coping with the effects of air and noise pollution on vulnerable populations within primary care need concerted efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Global HealthSame topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207