MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415615025 · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxaf032

A novel high-dimensional model for identifying regional DNA methylation QTLs

2024· article· en· W4415615025 on OpenAlexafffund
Kaiqiong Zhao, Archer Y. Yang, Karim Oualkacha, Yixiao Zeng, Kathleen Klein, Marie Hudson, Inés Colmegna, Sasha Bernatsky, Celia M.T. Greenwood

Bibliographic record

VenueBiostatistics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à MontréalMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence InstituteJewish General HospitalYork University
FundersCanadian Statistical Sciences InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInterpretabilityCovariateFlexibility (engineering)SmoothnessSelection (genetic algorithm)RegressionFeature selectionVariable (mathematics)Regression analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Varying coefficient models offer the flexibility to learn the dynamic changes of regression coefficients. Despite their good interpretability and diverse applications, in high-dimensional settings, existing estimation methods for such models have important limitations. For example, we routinely encounter the need for variable selection when faced with a large collection of covariates with nonlinear/varying effects on outcomes, and no ideal solutions exist. One illustration of this situation could be identifying a subset of genetic variants with local influence on methylation levels in a regulatory region. To address this problem, we propose a composite sparse penalty that encourages both sparsity and smoothness for the varying coefficients. We present an efficient proximal gradient descent algorithm that scales to high-dimensional predictor spaces, providing sparse solutions for the varying coefficients. A comprehensive simulation study has been conducted to evaluate the performance of our approach in terms of estimation, prediction and selection accuracy. We show that the inclusion of smoothness control yields much better results over sparsity-only approaches. An adaptive version of the penalty offers additional performance gains. We further demonstrate the utility of our method in identifying regional mQTLs from asymptomatic samples in the CARTaGENE cohort. The methodology is implemented in the R package sparseSOMNiBUS, available on GitHub.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.282
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiostatisticsSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207