Spatial Distribution and Temporal Dynamics of Neomycin-Induced Neuromast Cell Damage and Regeneration in the Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neuromast cells are specialized mechanosensory receptor cells embedded within the lateral line system of aquatic vertebrates, enabling the detection of water movement and vibration that are essential for navigation, prey capture, and predator avoidance. These cells share common evolutionary and functional homology with mammalian inner ear hair cells, both of which rely on stereocilia-mediated mechano-transduction and ion channel activation to convert mechanical stimuli into neural signals. Unlike their mammalian counterparts, neuromast hair cells possess a regenerative capacity following damage, making the lateral line system a unique model for studying hair cell regeneration and sensory restoration. This study examines the potential of the Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus) as a novel model organism for investigating ototoxicity and regeneration of neurosensory hair cells. Here, we explore the cranial and trunk lateral line neuromasts, including deep canal neuromast cells located in facial bones, such as the mandible and circumorbital bones. In the present study, juvenile surface-dwelling Mexican tetra were exposed to a 500 µM neomycin for 4 h to induce targeted hair cell damage. The samples were collected at 4-, 12-, 24-, and 72 h post-exposure. Furthermore, neuromast cell viability was assessed using [2-(4-(Dimethylamino) styryl)-N-ethylpyridinium iodide] (DASPEI). Gene expression analysis revealed a modest increase in Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 (fgf1) and Axis Inhibition Protein 2 (axin2) expression following treatment; however, these changes were not statistically significant. The SRY-box transcription factor 2 (sox2) remains constant throughout the exposure and recovery period. These findings highlighted the regenerative dynamics of neuromast cells in Mexican tetra. This work lays the foundation for future therapeutic strategies targeting human sensory deficits, particularly those involving inner ear hair cell degeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".