MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415616777 · doi:10.2514/1.c038299

Appropriate Lift Slope Model for Nonlinear Vortex Lattice Method

2025· article· en· W4415616777 on OpenAlexafffund
Vincent Liguori, Éric Laurendeau, Frédéric Moëns, Jacques Peter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aircraft · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersOffice National d'études et de Recherches AérospatialesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPolytechnique Montréal
KeywordsTransonicSwept wingNonlinear systemLift (data mining)VortexLift coefficientCompressibilityWingComputational fluid dynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work examines the formulation of the lift slope term used to compute the distribution of the effective angle-of-attack coupling variable within the nonlinear vortex lattice method (NL-VLM). This variable plays a significant role in the accuracy of the solution for transonic flow over swept wings. A new formulation is proposed, aiming to improve accuracy for such cases without any additional computational cost. First, a literature survey highlights significant differences among reported terms used. Second, the new proposed formulation is derived from an analysis of the VLM model on a swept geometry considering compressibility corrections. Finally, tests on an infinite swept wing and a finite swept wing relevant to commercial aircraft application demonstrate an increased accuracy. The results confirmed the superiority of the proposed method over previous models used in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AircraftSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207