MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415620825 · doi:10.3390/healthcare13212720

Prevalence, Geographic Variations, and Determinants of Pain Among Older Adults in China: Findings from the National Urban and Rural Elderly Population (UREP) Survey

2025· article· en· W4415620825 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Ge, Yutong Wu, Zhimeng Jia, Xiaohong Ning, Chen Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Opioid Use
Canadian institutionsMuscular Dystrophy CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusLogistic regressionOddsMainland ChinaChronic painChinaRural areaOdds ratioPopulationCross-sectional study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: This study aimed to reveal the prevalence, geographic variations, and determinants of pain among the Chinese older adult population and provide empirical strategies for pain management in older adults in China. Methods: A total of 21,346 Chinese residents aged ≥ 60 years from 31 provinces in mainland China participated in our survey. Standardized questionnaires were used to collect data on socioeconomic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and self-reported pain experiences. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between individual socioeconomic status, chronic diseases, and pain. Results: The national prevalence of pain was 56.5% (95% CI: 55.9–57.1%), representing approximately 140 million Chinese older adults. The prevalence increased with aging and peaked at 80 years and older (61.00%, 95% CI: 59.30–62.70%). Women (62.36%, 95% CI: 61.47–63.25%), rural residents (61.27%, 95% CI: 60.34–62.20%), and those with no formal education (65.08%, 63.90–66.26%) had a higher prevalence than men (50.27%, 95% CI: 49.32–51.22%), urban residents (52.19%, 95% CI: 51.28–53.10%), and those with higher education levels, respectively. Provincial prevalence ranged from 38.98% in Shanghai to 72.75% in Gansu Province. The presence of chronic diseases significantly increased the odds of pain, with multimorbidity (three or more chronic diseases) showing the strongest association (OR = 11.380, 95% CI: 10.257–12.627). Conclusions and Implications: Pain was highly prevalent among older adults in China and varied geographically. Socioeconomic status, chronic diseases, and multimorbidity were strongly associated with pain prevalence. Our findings support prioritizing the reduction in gender and geographic disparities in China’s pain management strategies. An integrated approach addressing both pain and chronic diseases should be urgently established in China’s healthcare system for older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcareSame topicPain Management and Opioid UseFrench-language works237,207