MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415622915 · doi:10.55274/r0000154

PR214-233810-R01 Revised PRCI Pipeline and Facility Threat Categories

2025· report· W4415622915 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stuart Guest

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)DocumentationIntegrity managementVariety (cybernetics)Threat assessmentPipeline transport

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report describes the update to Pipeline Research Council International (PRCI) threat categories, originally described in L51885 and L52317 for primarily onshore gas pipelines. The update was completed by reviewing threat categories published in Australia, Canada, Europe, and the USA. PRCI members were involved in reviewing the updated threat categories and their feedback was incorporated. The updated threat categories are now applicable to onshore, offshore, pipelines, facilities, and liquid and gas products, enabling integrity engineers to consider a variety of damage mechanism-based threats with a proposed conceptual test that requires consideration and documentation of a threat within an integrity management plan. The report also allows pipeline and facility incidents to be attributed to threat categories with higher fidelity than previous threat category systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0940.110

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Integrity and Reliability AnalysisFrench-language works237,207