MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415624055 · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2025.10.028

Tailoring α-MnO2 gas diffusion electrodes for enhanced oxygen reduction in aluminum-air batteries

2025· article· en· W4415624055 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Rampf, Robert Leiter, Simon Fleischmann, Giuseppe Antonio Elia, Roswitha Zeis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersHelmholtz AssociationBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungKarlsruhe Institute of Technology
KeywordsAnodeElectrodeCathodeDielectric spectroscopyGas diffusion electrodeElectrochemistryCatalysisAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Diffusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An optimization strategy for gas diffusion electrodes is presented by tuning the α-MnO 2 -to-Vulcan ratio, significantly enhancing oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) performance and demonstrating improved efficiency in a prototype Al-O 2 cell. α-MnO 2 is a promising, inexpensive, and readily producible catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in alkaline media, but its application is limited by low electronic conductivity. In this study, we enhance the performance of α-MnO 2 electrodes by systematically varying the α-MnO 2 -to-Vulcan ratio within the catalyst layer. Electrodes are evaluated in a gas diffusion electrode (GDE) half-cell, where an optimized catalyst layer composition leads to significantly improved ORR performance. By fine-tuning both the α-MnO 2 -Vulcan ratio and the α-MnO 2 loading, the electrode outperforms a commercial MnO 2 -based electrode and approaches the performance of the Pt/C benchmark. The improvement is attributed to the presence of a three-dimensional (3D) Vulcan network electronically connecting catalytically active α-MnO 2 sites with the substrate. Additionally, the optimized electrodes are employed in a prototype Al-O 2 flow cell. Under constant oxygen flow, power densities exceed 250 mW cm −2 , which is significantly higher than that of conventional Al-air batteries. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy combined with distribution of relaxation times (DRT) analysis enables the separation of anode and cathode charge transfer impedances without the need for an additional reference electrode. The analysis reveals that the anode contributes more than twice as much impedance as the cathode, highlighting the need for further anode optimization. This work demonstrates a transferable approach for catalyst layer screening under technically relevant conditions in the GDE half-cell. Subsequent measurements in an Al-O 2 flow cell validate the approach. The methodology is widely applicable to the development of advanced electrodes for a variety of metal-air battery technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Energy ChemistrySame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207