MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415624235 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3626553

Impact of Spatial Correlation on Link Selection and Delay Performance in Multi-RIS Networks

2025· article· en· W4415624235 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmed I. Abdulshakoor, Najah AbuAli, Hossam S. Hassanein

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Network packetBase stationSelection (genetic algorithm)Channel (broadcasting)Spatial correlationKey (lock)Node (physics)Correlation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface (RIS) technology has emerged as a key enabler for enhancing the performance of wireless communication networks. We investigate the deployment of multiple RISs within a cellular coverage area to enable diverse link options. We analytically characterize the impact of spatial correlation among RIS elements and derive the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) distribution for the direct link to the base station (BS) and the cascaded RIS-assisted link, under Nakagami-m fading. Building on this analysis, a comprehensive framework is developed to evaluate the average packet delay, addressing the gap in delay analysis under spatial correlation for multi-RIS systems. Moreover, we derive a closed-form condition to identify when the direct link outperforms RIS-assisted transmission, thus guiding link selection and RIS-user association based on delay performance. Numerical results highlight the substantial effect of spatial correlation on delay analysis and demonstrate that neglecting this factor can severely underestimate network performance by leading to suboptimal link selections. A high degree of correlation concentrates channel energy into a dominant eigenmode for single-user transmission, thereby enhancing the effective SNR. Furthermore, the results show that the proposed delay-based selection approach accurately evaluates feasible links with the aim of minimizing the average packet delay, achieving superior performance compared to benchmark methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207