Joint Uplink-Downlink Transmission Design and Full-Loop Control for Latency-Critical Cyber-Physical Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the significant advance of wireless communication technology, more networked control systems are looped via wireless networks. However, the dynamics and uncertainties of wireless channels as well as the limitation of radio resources make it challenging to close all loops at each control step. As the open-loop control will lead to performance deterioration, it is essential to jointly optimize the uplink and downlink transmissions for the full-loop control. In this paper, we analyze the impact of transmission delay in uplink and downlink on the full-loop control performance. We then propose a novel multicast transmission scheme for the latency-critical full-loop control. Accordingly, the uplink-downlink transmission and the full-loop control are jointly considered to minimize the control and communication cost. To effectively solve this mixed integer non-linear programming problem, the original problem is decomposed into the uplink transmission problem and the downlink transmission problem. Alternate resource optimization algorithm and multicast resource allocation algorithm are designed. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme has advantage on reducing both the communication and control cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".