MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415626703 · doi:10.2196/76752

Redesigning Telemedicine for Traditional Chinese Medicine: Service Design Approach to Digital Transformation

2025· article· en· W4415626703 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Arisara Jiamsanguanwong, Ratchapoom Kaingam, Oran Kittithreerapronchai, Waratta Authayarat

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Human Factors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelemedicineDigital transformationTask (project management)Service designDigital healthService (business)Transformative learningHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: With the rising global adoption of telemedicine, there is a crucial need to address inefficiencies and challenges in current service systems. This case study focused on enhancing the telemedicine service system of a traditional Chinese medicine clinic. Objective: The primary objective was to identify and address pain points and inefficiencies in the existing telemedicine system with the aim of streamlining service operations for the benefit of both patients and service providers. Methods: Through comprehensive service design analysis, including the creation of a customer journey map and a service blueprint, key areas for improvement were identified, and the service process was redesigned accordingly. A user-friendly web application was developed and evaluated using usability testing and satisfaction assessments. Participants took part voluntarily. Task testing was conducted using real-world scenarios, with index of item-objective congruence values ranging from 0.84 to 1.00. Participants were assigned role-specific tasks as either patients or service providers in a step-by-step format, followed by role-specific paper-based questionnaires. Results: The redesigned system successfully streamlined operations by automating processes and reducing task complexity, resulting in improved time efficiency for both user groups. Participants included 6 patients (aged 23-54 years) and 7 service providers from various departments. Usability testing revealed a task success rate of 100% for all tasks among patients, coordinators, physicians, and finance personnel as well as 83.33% among pharmacists. Satisfaction outcomes were positive: patients reported a net promoter score of 67, whereas service providers reported a mean System Usability Scale score of 71.4 (SD 20.76). Conclusions: This study highlights the transformative potential of telemedicine in health care delivery. For patients, consolidating services into a single digital platform improved accessibility and ease of use. For service providers, the system reduced repetitive tasks and facilitated more efficient task completion. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of service design methodologies in enhancing telemedicine systems, ultimately contributing to improved health care quality and patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Human FactorsSame topicTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationFrench-language works237,207