MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415628902 · doi:10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200594

End-to-end semantically aware tactile generation

2025· article· en· W4415628902 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Dastjerdi, Abbas Akkasi, Hilaire Djani, Majid Komeili

Bibliographic record

VenueIntelligent Systems with Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTactile and Sensory Interactions
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)Generator (circuit theory)MorphingSet (abstract data type)VisualizationPlot (graphics)Transformation (genetics)GrayscaleDomain (mathematical analysis)Pattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tactile graphics are an essential tool for conveying visual information to visually impaired individuals. However, translating 2D plots, such as B’ezier curves, polygons, and bar charts, into an effective tactile format remains a challenge. This paper presents a novel, two-stage deep learning pipeline for automating this conversion process. Our method leverages a Pix2Pix architecture, employing a U-Net++ generator network for robust image generation. To improve the perceptual quality of the tactile representations, we incorporate an adversarial perceptual loss function alongside a gradient penalty. The pipeline operates in a sequential manner: firstly, converting the source plot into a grayscale tactile representation, followed by a transformation into a channel-wise equivalent. We evaluate the performance of our model on a comprehensive synthetic dataset consisting of 20,000 source-target pairs encompassing various 2D plot types. To quantify performance, we utilize fuzzy versions of established metrics like pixel accuracy, Dice coefficient, and Jaccard index. Additionally, a human study is conducted to assess the visual quality of the generated tactile graphics. The proposed approach demonstrates promising results, significantly streamlining the conversion of 2D plots into tactile graphics. This paves the way for the development of fully automated systems, enhancing accessibility of visual information for visually impaired individuals. • A Novel Two-Step Pipeline: We propose a novel two-step pipeline for generating editable tactile representations of statistical data charts. • We introduce a set of tailored evaluation metrics specifically designed for assessing the quality of tactile graphics. • We contribute to the domain by creating a new dataset of work-related tactile graphics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntelligent Systems with ApplicationsSame topicTactile and Sensory InteractionsFrench-language works237,207