MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415638702 · doi:10.1088/2634-4505/ae186e

Optimization-based scheme for nearly-zero energy multi-storied residential buildings with architectural design elements

2025· article· en· W4415638702 on OpenAlex
Shrutismita Talukdar, Subhrajit Dutta, Golam Kabir

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy consumptionDaylightDaylightingBuilding envelopeEnvelope (radar)Parametric designEnergy (signal processing)ShadingConsumption (sociology)Scheme (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Global energy consumption has significantly increased as a result of the rise in appliance and equipment usage, which has been driven by technological improvements and economic expansion, particularly noticeable in the infrastructure and building industries. Among these, residential construction emerges as a prominent energy consumer in infrastructure development. Therefore, architects and engineers must prioritize the adoption of energy-efficient strategies in both planning and execution to create buildings that achieve net-zero or nearly-zero energy consumption levels. This study focuses on unconditioned residential building located in a warm–humid Indian climate. Energy consumption is minimized through a metamodel based genetic algorithm optimization framework that fine-tunes envelope parameters like orientation, window-to-wall ratio (WWR), shading depth, and shading angle to enhance daylight penetration, reduce artificial lighting requirements, and mitigate internal and solar heat gains. Here, a parametric model is created utilizing four architectural design variables: orientation, WWR, shading depth, and shading angle that generates a large number of options for the analysis of the building’s energy consumption. The outcomes of the case study demonstrate a significant decrease of 34.63% in energy consumption compared to the reference design, achieved through the optimal selection of design variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it