MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415638840 · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ae183e

Development of a motorized iris collimator for kilovoltage x-ray radiotherapy

2025· article· en· W4415638840 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Physics & Engineering Express · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Victoria
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsCollimatorImaging phantomFull width at half maximumBeam (structure)IsocenterLinear particle acceleratorRadiographyRepeatability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective. To design and build a motorized iris collimator suitable for a novel low-cost kilovoltage dual-robot radiotherapy device and test its reliability and dosimetric capabilities. Approach. A 12-leaflet motorized iris collimator was designed and built weighing 4.8 kg, with 1 mm thick tungsten leaflets, a beam size range of 0.1 cm to 16.5 cm, and a leaflet speed up to 20 cm/s. Dosimetric tests were performed with EBT4 Gafchromic film at depths of 0 to 10 cm in a Solid Water phantom at a source to surface distance of 38 cm using a 225 kVp beam with 2 mm of Al filtration. A Monte Carlo (MC) model of the experimental setup was developed. Beam size was determined by full width at half maximum (FWHM) and penumbra values were calculated for both film and MC. The beam size was measured experimentally using digital radiographs acquired for sizes between 5 and 150 mm to evaluate the robustness of the system. Main results. The collimator demonstrated sharp profiles with penumbra values ≤1.2 mm at 2 cm depth. 2D dose distributions from film measurements found dose leakage within the designed 2% as well as a single offset leaflet as a result of machining tolerance. MC matched film measurements with surface central dose differences ≤1.1%, a beam penumbra match within 0.08 mm, and a FWHM match within 1.1 mm. The linearity and repeatability showed that beam sizes can be set with an accuracy of ≤1.25 mm for beams ≥1 cm. Significance. This work showcases a motorized iris collimator designed for a novel low-cost radiotherapy device, capable of delivering sharp dose distributions. An MC model was successfully developed and matched to film measurements, allowing for accurate simulation of radiotherapy delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Methods
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Methods
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentallow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it