MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415639182 · doi:10.1016/j.lana.2025.101279

Refugee healthcare resilience and burdens: a 10-year mixed-methods analysis of system shocks in Canada

2025· article· en· W4415639182 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Eric Norrie, Linda Holdbrook, Rabina Grewal, Rachel Talavlikar, Mohammad Yasir Essar, Tyler Williamson, Annalee Coakley, Kerry McBrien, Gabriel E. Fabreau

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Regional Health - Americas · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryO'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary
KeywordsRefugeeResilience (materials science)Public healthHealth careHealthcare systemFoundation (evidence)Vulnerability (computing)Public policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: System shocks, including policy changes, refugee surges, and pandemics, strain healthcare systems. These shocks compound refugee health vulnerabilities, limiting care but may also trigger adaptive responses that build resilience. Understanding local responses is essential for resilient care models. Methods: This sequential explanatory mixed-methods retrospective study (2011-2020) examined how a refugee health centre in Alberta, Canada, responded to four shocks: Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) Cuts (2012), Syrian Surge (2015), Yazidi Resettlement (2017), and COVID-19 (2020). We hypothesized that each shock would drive temporary utilization changes, reflected in level (immediate) and slope (monthly rate of change) shifts, with corresponding impacts on patients and providers. Interrupted time series analysis estimated level and slope differences in monthly appointments (total, family physician, specialist, multidisciplinary team). Interviews with health centre leaders were thematically analyzed using an adapted Health System Resilience framework and integrated with quantitative findings to assess resilience and operational burdens. Findings: Between 2011 and 2020, 10,661 refugees from 106 countries attended 107,642 appointments. The mean age was 24.49 years (SD 17.09; range 0-107), and 47.82% (5094) were female. Mean monthly appointments increased from 455 to 2,208, with an adjusted level difference of +1656.06 and slope increase of +95.68 (p < 0.0.01). Family physician and multidisciplinary team appointments rose substantially, while specialist care declined during COVID-19. Mean provider hours increased from 175.8 to 1097.3 (6.2-fold). Qualitative analysis indicated resilience capacities but also burnout, vicarious trauma, and financial strain. Integration revealed the centre developed resilience but experienced operational burden. Interpretation: Over a decade, the centre adapted to successive shocks, transforming into a beacon clinic. It demonstrated resilience through care expansion and innovation, at the cost of operational burden. Funding: O'Brien Institute for Public Health and the MSI Foundation of Alberta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Regional Health - AmericasSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207