MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415643459 · doi:10.3390/electronics14214197

Energy-Efficient User Association with Multi-Objective Optimization for Full-Duplex C-RAN Enabled Massive MIMO Systems

2025· article· en· W4415643459 on OpenAlexaff
Shruti Sharma, Wonsik Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximizationOptimization problemThroughputEnergy consumptionResource allocationMulti-objective optimizationTransformation (genetics)MIMOCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we developed an energy-efficient multi-user-associated optimization method involving a massive multi-input multi-output (M-MIMO) system-enabled Cloud Radio Access Network (C-RAN) in Full-Duplex (FD) mode. Maximization of energy efficiency (EE) was achieved with user association. We compose the non-convex multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem for resource allocation and user association in C-RAN. The resultant non-convex MOO problem is non-deterministic polynomial (NP) hard. To tackle this complexity, we find a trade-off between achievable rate and energy consumption. We first reaffirm the problem as an MOO targeting high throughput and minimizing energy consumption instantaneously. By using the epsilon (ε)-constraint method, we transform MOO to an equivalent single objective optimization (SOO) problem by majorization–minimization (MM) approach that enables the transformation of binaries into continuous variables. Further, we propose a multi-objective resource allocation algorithm to obtain a Pareto optimal solution. The simulation results show a significant gain in EE of C-RAN achieved through our proposed MOO algorithm. Our results also show remarkable trade-offs between EE and spectral efficiency (SE).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207