The Impact of Social Media Monetization on Youth Employmentand Economic Productivity in Nigeria’s Labor Market
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
s study explores the impact of social media monetization on youth employment and economic productivity in Nigeria’s labor market. As digital platforms like Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok offer youngNigerians opportunities for income generation, they also reshape traditional employment patterns. Theresearch examines the dual-edged nature of social media monetization, balancing the potential for eco-nomic empowerment against the challenges of job security, income volatility, and productivity. UtilizingMultinomial Logistic Regression, the study analyzes survey data from Nigerian youth engaged in digi-tal entrepreneurship to determine the effects on employment outcomes and economic productivity. Keyfindings highlight that while social media provides flexible employment opportunities, it may also diverttime from other productive activities, with implications for long-term economic growth. The study con-cludes with policy recommendations to optimize the benefits of digital entrepreneurship while addressingits challenges, aiming to integrate these emerging work patterns into Nigeria’s broader economic framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it