MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415644000 · doi:10.3390/engproc2025111029

Transient Analysis of Solar Driven Hydrogen Generation System Using Industrial Waste Water

2025· article· en· W4415644000 on OpenAlexaff
Muzaffar Ali, J.I. Akhter, Muhammad Usman, Muhammad Taha Manzoor, Müslüm Arıcı, Muhammad Aqil Khan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar-Powered Water Purification Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRNSYSWastewaterHydrogen productionIndustrial wastewater treatmentRenewable energySolar energySewage treatmentExergyPhotovoltaic system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates an integrated solar-powered system for wastewater treatment and hydrogen production, combining solar PV, a humidification–dehumidification (HDH) system, solar thermal collectors, and electrolysis. The objective is to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing industrial wastewater for both clean water production and green hydrogen generation. A transient analysis is conducted using TRNSYS and EES software, modeling a system designed to process 4000 kg of wastewater daily. The results indicate that the HDH system produces 300 kg of clean water per hour, while the electrolyzer generates approximately 66.5 kg of hydrogen per hour. The solar PV system operates under the weather conditions of Kohat, Pakistan. This integrated approach demonstrates significant potential for sustainable wastewater treatment and renewable energy production, offering a promising solution for industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar-Powered Water Purification MethodsFrench-language works237,207