Integrative therapy for acute, subacute and chronic facial palsy: repeated differential facial nerve blocks combined with hypodermic needle-based facial nerve stimulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Despite various recommended treatments, no effective therapy has been established for the satisfactory rehabilitation of subacute and chronic debilitating facial palsy. To address this, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel therapeutic approach that combines repeated differential facial nerve blocks with facial nerve stimulation using a hypodermic needle. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients (acute, n = 4; subacute, n = 3; chronic, n = 40) who were treated at a private pain clinic between January 2017 and December 2023. Patients with persistent facial palsy who were unresponsive to conventional therapies underwent repeated sessions of bilateral facial nerve block following hypodermic needle stimulation of the facial nerves and branches. Facial function was assessed using the House–Brackmann and Sunnybrook grading systems. Results More than 85% of patients showed significant improvements in facial symmetry and function. In the chronic group, Sunnybrook scores improved from 42 to 78 ( P < 0.01), and House-Brackmann grades improved from IV–V to I–II. In the acute and subacute groups, both grading scores showed significant improvement. Transient bruising was noted as a minor adverse event, and the clinical improvement remained stable after treatment. Conclusions Our novel integrative treatment is demonstrated to be a safe and effective option for treating intractable subacute and chronic facial palsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".