Energy-Aware Swarm Robotics in Smart Microgrids Using Quantum-Inspired Reinforcement Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The integration of autonomous robots with intelligent electrical systems introduces complex energy management challenges, particularly as microgrids increasingly incorporate renewable energy sources and storage devices in widely distributed environments. This study proposes a quantum-inspired multi-agent reinforcement learning (QI-MARL) framework for energy-aware swarm coordination in smart microgrids. Each robot functions as an intelligent agent capable of performing multiple tasks within dynamic domestic and industrial environments while optimizing energy utilization. The quantum-inspired mechanism enhances adaptability by enabling probabilistic decision-making, allowing both robots and microgrid nodes to self-organize based on task demands, battery states, and real-time energy availability. Comparative experiments across 1500 grid-based simulated environments demonstrated that when benchmarked against the classical MARL baseline, QI-MARL achieved an 8% improvement in path efficiency, a 12% increase in task success rate, and a 15% reduction in energy consumption. When compared with the rule-based approach, improvements reached 15%, 20%, and 26%, respectively. Ablation studies further confirmed the substantial contributions of the quantum-inspired exploration and energy-sharing mechanisms, while sensitivity and scalability analyses validated the system’s robustness across varying swarm sizes and environmental complexities. The proposed framework effectively integrates quantum-inspired AI, intelligent microgrid management, and autonomous robotics, offering a novel approach to energy coordination in cyber-physical systems. Potential applications include smart buildings, industrial campuses, and distributed renewable energy networks, where the system enables flexible, resilient, and energy-efficient robotic operations within modern electrical engineering contexts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".