Scalable Hybrid Arrays Overcome Electrode Scaling Limitations in Micro-Photosynthetic Power Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Micro-photosynthetic power cells (μPSCs), also known as biophotovoltaics (BPVs), represent sustainable and self-regenerating solutions for harvesting electricity from photosynthetic microorganisms. However, their practical deployment has been constrained by low voltage, low current output, and scaling inefficiencies. In this work, we address these limitations through a dual-optimization strategy: (i) systematic quantification of how electrode surface area influences key performance metrics, and (ii) based on our previous work we highlighted the novel hybrid modular array architectures that combine series and parallel connections of μPSCs. Three single μPSCs with electrode areas of 4.84, 19.36, and 100 cm2 were fabricated and compared, revealing that while open-circuit voltage remains largely area-independent (850–910 mV), both short-circuit current and maximum power scale with electrode size. Building on these insights, two hybrid array configurations fabricated from six 4.84 cm2 μPSCs achieved power outputs of 869.2 μW and 926.4 μW, equivalent to ~82–87% of the output of a large 100 cm2 device, while requiring only ~29% electrode area and ~70% less reagent volume. Importantly, these arrays delivered voltages up to 2.4 V, significantly higher than a single large device, enabling easier integration with IoT platforms and ultra-low-power electronics. A meta-analysis of over 40 reported BPV/μPSC systems with different electrode surface areas further validated our findings, showing a consistent inverse relationship between electrode area and power density. Collectively, this study introduces a scalable, resource-efficient strategy for enhancing μPSC performance, providing a novel design paradigm that advances the state of the art in sustainable bioenergy and opens pathways for practical deployment in distributed, low-power and IoT applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".