Chemical control for the morphogenesis of conducting polymer dendrites in water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
evolving intelligence in wetware devices. During CPD morphogenesis, voltage transients drive the physical evolution of electrically conductive structures, thereby programming their filtering properties as nonlinear analog devices. Whether studied in an electrochemical experiment or in neuromorphic devices, the dependence of the electrical properties of the electrogenerated structures on the chemical composition of their growth environment is still unreported. In this study, we report the existing interconnection between the nature and concentration of the electrolytes, electroactive compounds and co-solvents and the electrical and electrochemical properties of CPDs in an aqueous electrolyte. CPDs exhibit various chemical sensitivities in water: their morphology is highly dependent on the nature of the chemical resources available in their environment. The selection of these resources therefore critically influences morphogenesis. In addition, the concentrations of the different electrochemical species have varying impacts on growth dynamics, modulating the balance between thermodynamic and kinetic control over polymer electrosynthesis. By correlating the dependencies of these evolving objects with the availability of the chemical resources in an aqueous environment, this study offers guidelines to tune the degree of evolution of electronic materials in water and highlights potential avenues for their application. Such evolving hardware is envisioned to exploit the chemical complexity of real-world environments as part of information processing technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".