MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Factors influencing the Digital Transformation of Vietnam SMEs

2025· article· W4415659647 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nhat Nguyen Cong, Le Nguyen Thi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital transformationStructural equation modelingSustainabilityKey (lock)Survey data collectionEmerging marketsBusiness model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the key factors influencing the Digital Transformation (DT) of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Vietnam, a sector crucial for national economic development and competitiveness. Drawing from both organizational and technological perspectives, the research identifies drivers, challenges, and success factors related to the adoption of digital tools and processes. Using a quantitative methodology, data were collected via an online survey targeting 321 SMEs owners, managers, and administrators across multiple regions in Vietnam. The analysis, conducted through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), reveals that leadership competencies, firm size, access to digital infrastructure, and external market pressures are significant determinants of DT success. Additionally, the study highlights the role of DT in enhancing business sustainability through improved operational efficiency, customer engagement, and market reach. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the DT journey within developing economies and offer actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders aiming to accelerate digital adoption among SMEs in Vietnam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Analysis and ApplicationsSame topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207