Right ventricular dysfunction in structural tricuspid interventions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the growing global adoption of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) and the increasing number of available devices, a comprehensive understanding of right heart dysfunction has become essential. Right heart dysfunction is frequently observed both before and after TTVI and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Therefore, a thorough understanding of right heart anatomy and physiology is critical for accurately assessing its pathological states. This review synthesizes current knowledge by integrating findings from major landmark studies on TTVI, with a focus on the available assessment tools for predicting patient outcomes. The anatomy section systematically reviews each component of the right heart-the right atrium, right ventricle, tricuspid valve, and pulmonary valve -while the physiology section emphasizes microstructural characteristics and the pressure-volume relationships. In addition, recommendations from the Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium and the imaging parameters used in recent studies are discussed. Finally, future directions for imaging-based assessment of right heart function in the context of TTVI are highlighted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".