NeuPPS: Neural Piecewise Parametric Surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Piecewise parametric surfaces have long been established as prevalent geometric representations; however, they often require surface refinement or sophisticated quadrangulation to accurately represent complex geometries. Geometric deep learning has shown that neural networks can provide greater representational power than conventional methods. Nevertheless, approaches using a single parametric surface for shape fitting struggle to capture fine-grained geometric details, while multi-patch methods fail to ensure seamless connections between adjacent patches. We present Neural Piecewise Parametric Surfaces ( NeuPPS ), the first piecewise neural surface representation that allows for coarse patch layouts composed of arbitrary n -sided surface patches to model complex surface geometries with high precision, offering enhanced flexibility compared with traditional parametric surfaces. This new surface representation guarantees, by construction, the continuity between adjacent patches, a property that other neural patch-based approaches cannot ensure. Two novel components are introduced: a learnable feature complex and a continuous mapping function approximated by multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs). We apply the proposed NeuPPS to surface fitting and shape space learning tasks. Extensive experiments demonstrate the advantages of NeuPPS over traditional parametric representations and existing patch-based learning approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".