MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415665768 · doi:10.1145/3772008.3772018

Summary of the 2nd International Workshop on Multi-disciplinary, Open, and IntegRatEd Requirements Engineering (MO2RE) co-located with the 47th IEEE/ACM ICSE 2025

2025· article· en· W4415665768 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrustworthinessRequirements engineeringSoftware requirementsSoftwareRequirements analysisRequirements elicitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Requirements Engineering (RE) is a critical sub-field of Software Engineering (SE), involving activities to identify, specify, model, analyze, and validate system needs and constraints. RE plays a fundamental role in the SE process. With the current advances in AI, new opportunities for RE arise to ensure the development of trustworthy AI and to utilize AI to perform various RE-related activities more effectively and efficiently. The workshop on Multi-disciplinary, Open, and IntegRatEd RE (MO2RE) successfully addresses the underrepresentation of the RE within the SE community, raises awareness of RE's diverse aspects, and fosters collaboration. The second edition took place on April 27th, 2025, co-located with the 47th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) in Ottawa, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it