Next-Hour Lake-Effect Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts over the Great Lakes with Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Lake-effect precipitation, which significantly impacts regions downwind of the Great Lakes, poses unique forecasting challenges due to its dependence on localized processes and intricate interactions, making it an ideal candidate for deep learning. This study introduces a novel approach toward next-hour quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) for lake-effect precipitation by leveraging an improved generative adversarial network (GAN). Key innovations include testing multiple input variable groupings, modernizing the generator and discriminator, and expanding predictions to four Great Lakes: Superior, Michigan, Erie, and Ontario. A UNetFormer generator and spectral normalization in the discriminator are added to a pix2pix GAN framework to predict next-hour QPF for lake-effect events. A novel dataset is developed for the model with High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) and Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS) system fields for input and MRMS precipitation estimates for the target. Five input variable groupings are tested to identify the optimal predictors for each of the four lakes, and saliency analysis is applied to identify the most important input variables. Two models are developed for each lake: one with a weighted loss function [Lake-Effect Snow Network–Aggressive (LESNet-A)] and one without [Lake-Effect Snow Network–Base (LESNet-B)]. The developed models outperform the HRRR’s predictions across all six metrics, with gains of over 100% over the HRRR in Pearson correlation coefficient and fractions skill score indicating superior forecasts in all precipitation intensities. LESNet-A performs better in heavier events, while LESNet-B performs better in lighter events. Both are comparable in light events. Their outstanding performance notably displays the significant potential of modernized GANs to advance lake-effect precipitation prediction. Significance Statement Lake-effect precipitation significantly impacts many communities across the world. Its highly localized and variable nature poses a significant challenge to forecasters in predicting it accurately and precisely. This study leverages recent advances in deep learning to improve precipitation forecasts during lake-effect events in the next hour. Deep learning enables models to learn patterns inherent to lake-effect precipitation autonomously. The models developed demonstrate superior performance to the state-of-the-art High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model in precipitation amounts and locations, with percent gains in all metrics and over 100% gains in Pearson correlation coefficient and fractions skill score. Their ability to more accurately and precisely predict precipitation reflects their capability to provide improved, invaluable forecasts to the public during lake-effect events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".