MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415667347 · doi:10.55016/ojs/muj.v3i1.80961

Queer Pop Stardom

2025· article· W4415667347 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Skipp

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Motley Undergraduate Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerFemininityPopular cultureVisionLesbianQueer theoryHeteronormativityFeminismCloset

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chappell Roan, an emerging talent in queer pop music, challenges traditional heteronormative ideals through camp aesthetics, drag culture, and storytelling. Her debut album, The Rise and Fall of a Midwest Princess, offers a genuine portrayal of queer identity, rooted in her experiences growing up in conservative Missouri. This paper examines Roan’s music and performance style through the lenses of queer theory and camp, emphasizing her critique of compulsory heterosexuality, gender norms, and the commercialization of queerness in pop culture. Tracks like “Pink Pony Club” and “Good Luck, Babe!” showcase her defiance against societal expectations, presenting aspirational visions of queer liberation. Roan’s use of exaggerated femininity and theatricality aligns her with queer pop icons while creating a space for LGBTQ+ fans to engage in radical self-expression. Her embrace of drag culture and bold humour further challenges rigid concepts of gender and sexuality, highlighting pop music’s potential as a platform for queer world-building. Ultimately, Roan’s artistry redefines the landscape of queer pop stardom, highlighting the significance of representation that is both celebratory and revolutionary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Motley Undergraduate JournalSame topicMusic History and CultureFrench-language works237,207