MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415667423 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v20i2.73655

On next-to-minimum size blocking sets of external lines to a nondegenerate quadric in $\operatorname{PG}(3,q)$

2025· article· W4415667423 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bart De Bruyn, Puspendu Pradhan, Binod Kumar Sahoo

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Discrete Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicHolomorphic and Operator Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesScience and Engineering Research BoardNational Institute of Science Education and ResearchCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
KeywordsQuadricBlocking (statistics)Set (abstract data type)Interval (graph theory)Plane (geometry)Blocking setType (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider a hyperbolic or an elliptic quadric $Q^\epsilon(3,q)$, $\epsilon \in \{ +,- \}$, in $\operatorname{PG}(3,q)$ and let $\mathcal{E}^\epsilon$ denote the set of all lines of $\operatorname{PG}(3,q)$ that are external with respect to $Q^\epsilon(3,q)$. If $\pi$ is a (tangent or secant) plane of $\operatorname{PG}(3,q)$, then $\pi \setminus Q^\epsilon(3,q)$ is an $\mathcal{E}^\epsilon$-blocking set which is minimal, except when $(q,\epsilon) = (2,+)$ and $\pi$ is a secant plane. In this way, we obtain two families of (minimal) blocking sets of sizes $m_1^\epsilon$ and $m_2^\epsilon$, with $(m_1^+,m_2^+)=(q^2-q,q^2)$ and $(m_1^-,m_2^-)=(q^2,q^2+q)$, where those of size $m_1^\epsilon$ are also the minimum size $\mathcal{E}^\epsilon$-blocking sets. Motivated by the search for new (families of) minimal $\mathcal{E}^\epsilon$-blocking sets with sizes in the open interval $]m_1^\epsilon,m_2^\epsilon[$, we determine here all $\mathcal{E}^\epsilon$-blocking sets of size $m_1^\epsilon+1$ in $\operatorname{PG}(3,q)$ in the case $q \in \{ 2,3 \}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Discrete MathematicsSame topicHolomorphic and Operator TheoryFrench-language works237,207