MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

COOPERATION OF RESEARCHERS OF KREMENETS TARAS SHEVCHENKO REGIONAL ACADEMY OF HUMANITIES AND PEDAGOGY AND THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTROH ACADEMY IN THE FIELD OF UKRAINIAN SAMCHUK STUDIES

2025· article· W4415668902 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
O. M. Vasylyshyn

Bibliographic record

VenueNaukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ» Serìâ «Fìlologìâ» · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianPublishingPortraitField (mathematics)Promotion (chess)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the past twenty years, researchers from Kremenets Taras Shevchenko Regional Academy of Humanities and Pedagogy and the National University of Ostroh Academy have been cooperating in the field of Ukrainian Samchuk studies. The article chronologically traces their participation in symposia dedicated, among other things, to the prominent Ukrainian emigrant writer Ulas Samchuk. The author emphasises the special role of Valerii Polkovskyi, Head of the Centre for Canadian Studies of the National University of Ostroh Academy, whose professional interests were aligned with the scholars of our Academy. The author also analyzes the chronicle of the participation of O. Vasylyshyn, I. Kominyarska, O. Pasichnyk and others in the traditional Canadian Scientific Readings. Additionally, the article focuses on the role of Professor P. Kraliuk in the study and promotion of Samchuk's heritage, including the publication of his literary portrait of the Volyn writer by the Kharkiv publishing house Folio. It is noted that with the assistance of P. Kraliuk, almost all of the writer's works were published there.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNaukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ» Serìâ «Fìlologìâ»Same topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207