MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415671716 · doi:10.2196/78397

The Mechanism of Online Health Information Seeking Switching to Online Medical Consultation: Cross-Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4415671716 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lijiang Zhang, Jingjing Xia, Liuan Wang, Wenjie Ren

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanism (biology)Health careHealth informationInformation seekingOnline participationLogic modelThe InternetDigital healthClinical decision support system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Internet health care plays a crucial role in addressing the challenge of distributing high-quality medical resources and promoting the optimal allocation of these resources and health equity in China. Online medical consultation (OMC) plays a more significant role than online health information seeking (OHIS). Currently, the proportion of Chinese patients using OMC is low. Therefore, it is essential to enhance patient engagement with OMC and fully leverage the role of internet health care in optimizing the allocation of medical resources. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the correlation mechanisms of online medical community users' switching behaviors from OHIS to OMC. METHODS: This study is based on the knowledge-attitude-practice theory, which combines the social support theory and the health belief model to construct a research model of users' willingness to transition from OHIS to OMC. The study adopts a questionnaire survey and structural equation modeling method to conduct an empirical study. RESULTS: Gaining knowledge about information support has a significant positive impact on perceived susceptibility (β=.339, P<.001), perceived severity (β=.348, P<.001), and perceived benefits (β=.361, P<.001), while having a significant negative impact on perceived barriers (β=-.285, P<.001). Gaining knowledge about emotional support positively affects perceived susceptibility (β=.220, P<.001) and perceived benefits (β=.149, P<.01) but does not significantly influence perceived severity (β=-.006, P>.05) or perceived barriers (β=.099, P>.05). Perceived susceptibility (β=.123, P<.05), perceived severity (β=.174, P<.001), and perceived benefits (β=.273, P<.001) positively influence patients' transition to online consultation behavior, whereas perceived barriers (β=-.112, P<.05) negatively impact this switch. In addition, we found that gaining knowledge about information support not only directly affects patients' behavior in switching to online consultations but also impacts patients' OMCs through perceived susceptibility (14.23%), perceived severity (13.17%), and perceived benefits (25.28%). In contrast, gaining knowledge about emotional support does not directly influence patient behavior transfer; it operates only through perceived susceptibility (46.95%) and perceived benefit (52.90%). CONCLUSIONS: This study integrated the knowledge-attitude-practice framework, social support theory, and health belief model to uncover the internal logic of patients' behavioral transfers within online health communities. It confirmed the mediating role of the cognitive-emotional dual-drive pathway and health beliefs. The findings provide a scientific basis for the functional design of online health care platforms and for precise health knowledge dissemination strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.601
Teacher spread0.483 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative Research→Same topicHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility→French-language works237,207→