MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415673648 · doi:10.1002/epi4.70168

Ketogenic diet for infantile epileptic spasms

2025· article· en· W4415673648 on OpenAlexafffund
Morris H. Scantlebury, Anamika Choudhary, Andy Cheuk‐Him Ng, Cezar Gavrilovici

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Children's Hospital Research InstituteHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary
KeywordsKetogenic dietVigabatrinEpilepsyEpilepsy syndromesAnimal studiesSeizure typesEtiologyKetosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximately half of all cases of Infantile Epileptic Spasms Syndrome (IESS) do not respond to vigabatrin and hormonal therapies. There is no clear consensus as to the second-line therapy for IESS. Ketogenic diet (KD) has emerged as an effective treatment for certain drug-resistant epilepsies and in many cases of IESS. Understanding the mechanism of action of the KD in IESS will allow for harnessing the power of the KD and discovering novel therapeutics for IESS. In this review, we will summarize the current state of knowledge of the action of the KD in IESS derived from animal models. We emphasize the importance of the KD in altering respiration to cause brain acidosis. In addition, we review recent data implicating altered gut microbiome and the tryptophan-serotonin-kynurenine pathway in KD animals with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Infantile Epileptic Spasms Syndrome is a serious seizure condition in babies, often resistant to standard drugs, failing in half of cases. Animal studies helped unravel multiple mechanisms through which a high-fat, low-carb ketogenic diet can control seizures, including altering gut bacteria, reducing inflammation, balancing brain chemicals, boosting mitochondrial function, or adjusting breathing to slightly acidify the brain. These findings could lead to new, targeted therapies that are simpler to use and more accessible for families facing this challenging condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsia OpenSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207