MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415674453 · doi:10.2196/78536

Information Deficits, Information Needs, and Preferences Regarding eHealth in a Dutch Population With Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

2025· article· en· W4415674453 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sharon Oude Veldhuis, Maureen Guichelaar, Marjolein E.M. den Ouden, Julia E.W.C. van Gemert‐Pijnen, Constance H.C. Drossaert

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordseHealthPopulationIntervention (counseling)Survey researchMEDLINETelemedicineHealth information

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Globally, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a common lifestyle-related disease. Lifestyle interventions focusing on healthy eating habits, physical exercise, and reducing body weight in case of obesity are the primary recommended therapies to reverse or improve MASLD. However, patients often experience difficulties in complying with the required lifestyle changes for several reasons, including a lack of knowledge. Health care professionals express limited time during consultations as one of the barriers to discussing lifestyle behavior change. A potential solution to eliminate these barriers and improve the provision of information to patients with MASLD is the use of eHealth. Objective: This study aimed to explore the information needs and deficits of patients with MASLD regarding a variety of disease-related topics and their preferences regarding a future eHealth intervention. Methods: In a cross-sectional survey study, patients with MASLD were recruited via 2 Dutch patient organizations. The questionnaire included questions on sociodemographics, information provision and needs, and preferences regarding an eHealth intervention. Data were reported using descriptive statistics. Pearson chi-square tests and logistic regression analysis were used to identify differences in outcomes between subgroups. Results: The questionnaire was filled out by 449 respondents (women: 363/449, 81%; age: mean 56, SD 11 y). Fewer than 20% of them indicated that they had received sufficient information on a broad range of disease-related topics. Approximately 72% (325/449) to 90% (405/449) of respondents indicated that they would like to receive additional information. Respondents who did not know their disease stage reported a significantly higher need for information on general topics, compared to respondents who reported their disease stage (P values ranging from <.01 to .03). Respondents with (self-reported) metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis were more interested in contact with fellow patients than respondents with an early or unknown stage of disease (P=.002). Regarding a future eHealth intervention, respondents were most interested in receiving MASLD-related information, practical examples, and references to relevant websites or apps. Respondents were least interested in contact, collaboration, or competition with other app users. Conclusions: The vast majority of respondents reported a high rate of information deficits on a broad range of MASLD-related topics and expressed a strong need for additional information. Insights into information needs and preferences regarding eHealth can be used to develop an eHealth intervention for patients with MASLD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative Research→Same topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→