MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415674791 · doi:10.1101/gad.353024.125

ERRγ impedes neuroendocrine prostate cancer development

2025· article· en· W4415674791 on OpenAlexafffund
Ting Li, Catherine R. Dufour, Lingwei Han, Anthony Alfonso, Mirna H Farhat, Annabelle Beaumier, Qian Chen, Jin-jian Lu, Vincent Giguère

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes & Development · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
FundersTerry Fox Research InstituteScience and Technology Development FundNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCancer Research Society
KeywordsProstate cancerProstateNeuroendocrine differentiationDownregulation and upregulationEZH2Cell growthCancerNeuroendocrine tumors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is a lethal subtype of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The molecular mechanisms underlying the progression of CRPC toward NEPC remain incompletely understood, and effective treatments remain to be discovered. Here, we report that loss of the nuclear receptor ERRγ promotes neuroendocrine differentiation in a Pten-deficient mouse model of prostate adenocarcinoma. These findings were recapitulated in advanced cellular and xenograft models of human prostate cancer. Critically, we show that ERRγ gain of function can reverse instilled NEPC features accompanied by suppression of growth and oncogenic metabolic reprogramming. Activation of a neuroendocrine transcriptional program enabled by ERRγ deficiency unveiled a targetable vulnerability exploited by the combined pharmacological inhibition of EZH2 and RET kinase that effectively inhibited the growth of ERRγ-deficient tumor organoids and cells. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that ERRγ downregulation facilitates prostate cancer adeno-to-neuroendocrine transformation and offer potential therapeutic strategies to prevent/treat the development of poor outcome NEPC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes & DevelopmentSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207