MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415675132 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556136

Near-continuous tracking of solar active region NOAA 13664 over three solar rotations

2025· article· W4415675132 on OpenAlexaff
I. Kontogiannis, Yingjie Zhu, Krzysztof Barczyński, Muriel Zoë Stiefel, Hannah Collier, James McKevitt, J. S. Castellanos Durán, S. V. Berdyugina, L. K. Harra

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolar rotationOrbiterSolar flareFlux (metallurgy)Tracking (education)Coronal mass ejectionGeostationary orbitSolar observatoryGeostationary Operational Environmental SatelliteSolar minimum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Magnetic flux emergence and decay in the Sun are processes that can span from days to months. However, their tracking is typically limited to about half a solar rotation when relying on single-vantage-point observations, providing only a partial view of the phenomenon. Aims. This study aims to monitor the magnetic and coronal evolution and characterize the non-potentiality of the solar active region NOAA 13664, one of the most complex and eruptive regions of the past two decades, over more than three full solar rotations, by combining observations from both the Earth-facing side of the Sun and the far side. Methods. We used photospheric magnetograms and extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) filtergrams from Solar Orbiter and the Solar Dynamics Observatory, taken continuously over a 94 day period, along with 969 flare detections from combining the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite and the Spectrometer/Telescope for Imaging X-rays instrument on board the Solar Orbiter. All images were deprojected into a common coordinate system and merged into a unified dataset. We tracked the evolution of magnetic flux and EUV emission and computed magnetic field parameters from the line-of-sight magnetograms to quantify the region’s non-potentiality. The latter comprise the first continuous time series of their kind. Results. We successfully identified the region’s initial emergence and followed its evolution through to its decay. The region developed through successive flux emergence episodes over a period of 20 days, reached its peak complexity one month after the first emergence, and gradually decayed over the following two months. Unlike many complex regions, it consistently maintained high levels of non-potentiality for most of its lifetime, sustaining equally strong flaring activity. The derived time series of non-potentiality parameters far exceeded the typical 14 day window imposed by solar rotation and were remarkably consistent, exhibiting strong correlation with the flaring activity of the region. Conclusions. Multi-vantage-point observations offer valuable insights into the dynamics of flux emergence and decay, beyond the two-week limit imposed by solar rotation on observations along the Sun-Earth line. The corresponding combined datasets can significantly improve our understanding of how magnetic flux emerges, evolves, and drives solar activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207