Monitoring of stand quality of coastal shelterbelts using synergistic drone multispectral and LiDAR point cloud data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coastal shelterbelts serve as ecological safety barriers in coastal areas, and the effective evaluation of stand quality (SQ) is crucial for enhancing their development potential and supporting decision-making for sustainable management and environmental improvement. However, improving SQ and accurately monitoring coastal shelterbelts remains challenging due to factors such as limited soil resources, tree biological characteristics, and coastal storm surges. This study focuses on the typical coastal shelterbelt species Casuarina equisetifolia. Firstly, based on field survey data, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, stand parameters such as mean tree height, diameter at breast height, crown width, canopy closure, and stand density were selected from both stand growth status and structure for the quantitative evaluation of SQ in Casuarina equisetifolia shelterbelts. Secondly, by combining drone-based multispectral and LiDAR point cloud data, the study explores the applicability of Individual Tree Integration and Stand Regression methods in the inversion of stand parameters for Casuarina equisetifolia shelterbelts. Ultimately, precise remote sensing monitoring of Casuarina equisetifolia SQ was achieved at the stand scale. The results of this study provide technical references and a theoretical basis for the efficient monitoring of SQ and management of coastal shelterbelts, which are significantly essential for their sustainable development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".