MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modeling industrial shaft furnaces and investigation of CH4-related side reactions

2025· article· en· W4415681194 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yang Fei, Shibo Kuang, Xiaoping Guan, Aibing Yu, Tim Evans, Sunny Song, Ning Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Thermal Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaRio TintoAustralian Research CouncilMonash University
KeywordsWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The shaft furnace is a promising low-carbon ironmaking technology, but its complex internal processes pose challenges for efficient operation and control. Numerical simulation provides an effective method for revealing the internal states, whereas many existing models incorporate simplifications that limit prediction accuracy. This study presents a CFD model for industrial MIDREX shaft furnaces, incorporating major reactions, including CH 4 -related side reactions. An improved unreacted shrinking core model (USCM) is introduced for reduction based on the thermodynamic equilibrium diagram. It allows for the decoupling of reaction and diffusion layers, reducing the reaction layers and enabling variable diffusion structures. Consequently, the reaction model provides a more physically realistic and thermodynamically consistent representation of the multi-step reduction process, is valid for H 2 –CO mixtures, and increases computational efficiency by 65–75 %. The model is validated using four sets of laboratory and industrial data, covering inner states and overall performance parameters. It also successfully captures the influence of CH 4 , an inevitable component arising from reforming. A high CH 4 content causes substantial heat loss near the gas inlet and reduces metallization, primarily due to the combined effects of endothermic reduction and side reactions. Based on simulation results, an optimal CH 4 level is identified to balance metallization, gas utilization, and energy efficiency. The model can serve as a valuable tool for analyzing shaft furnace performance and has the potential to support the evaluation of advanced decarbonization strategies such as high H 2 content operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Thermal EngineeringSame topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207